Archive for November, 2009

Centerra Gamble – $112 Million of Public Debt

Wednesday, November 25th, 2009

Following the recent foreclosure announcements regarding The Promenade Shops at Centerra we received many requests from our readers to better explain Centerra’s public bond debt that we have alluded to in the past but not covered in detail.

Click here to read the story detailing the debt and the escalating payments obligated until 2029. McWhinney has reported to locally elected officials the bonds are a fixed interest rate and Centerra is financially sound.

A closer look reveals the bonds issued in 2008 are “variable” rate bonds now at 3.5%. Centerra has signed an agreement with RBS called a “swap agreement” to limit their exposure to changing interest rates but there is risk in these types of agreements. This is explained in more detail towards the end of our story.

Having spent the money from the 2008 bonds McWhinney has been desperately seeking ways to continue developing Centerra with other types of tax waivers and government subsidies. According to the 2008 Centerra audit, the escalating bond debt service payments will exceed current revenues by 2011. Not counting for maintenance and other obligations of the Centerra Metro Districts, failure to continue growing may cause a financial crises as the district will need just under $10 million per year to make the annual bond debt payments. Centerra’s 2008 revenue was only $8 million (property taxes $5 million and “fees” or sales taxes just over $2 million). You can see the reason for concern.

Promenade Shops at Centerra in Foreclosure

Wednesday, November 18th, 2009

Please take a moment to read our story about the Promenade Shops at Centerra.

Contrary to what has been reported, McWhinney and their managing partner for the Promenade Shops at Centerra have not been on the same page regarding the development since 2007. Poag & McEwen (see video clip in the story) expressed concern that the project was overbuilt for the market and described it as “vulnerable.” Poag & McEwen told Loveland’s City Council that the Promenade Shops at Centerra were still 10 years away from being able to withstand competition from adjacent developments. McWhinney has tried to buy out Poag & McEwen but failed to reach agreeable terms with the developer that created the name “Lifestyle Centers” to describe the type of commercial and retail centers they develop.

McWhinney is telling another community that the economic slow-down will not impact their ability to finance a huge commercial project in Garden Grove, California. Loveland is being told the inability of the Promenade Shops LLC to obtain financing is due mostly to the economic downturn.

The truth is the reasons are likely a combination of factors including McWhinney’s credit rating, the confidence level the lender has in the commercial development based on sales history and lease agreements and the economy which effects all of the above.

Financing a major shopping center on a note that is due and payable in only 5 years does beg the obvious question of “what were they thinking?” Many commercial developers have taken 15 to 20 year notes out in that time-frame and many with adjustable interest rates which is still less risky. In the case of McWhinney, they took a big gamble on the availability of funds to renegotiate the debt and lost. In the meantime, the loan would have typically cost them less during that period than other financing given the short turn-around required for the money they borrowed.

Of course, the taxpayer funded Metro District is vulnerable as well should they fail to end the foreclosure process and cause a disruption in the revenue stream now required from all the Centerra developments to payback the $112 million public bond debt they also incurred. We believe people in the private sector have every right to take whatever risk they want to finance a new development since they are the ones at risk. Unfortunately, this project is heavily subsidized so taking such risks was inappropriate and demonstrates again the clear need for greater financial oversight by city officials when subsidizing projects with taxpayer money.

McWhinney’s gamble may become the city’s loss but we certainly hope not. Maybe McWhinney should hold-back on ambitious new projects in California long enough to put this project on a more sound financial footing.

Any comments?

Johnson May Try And Delay Mayor Pro Tem Vote Tonight

Tuesday, November 17th, 2009

Loveland’s new Mayor, Cecil Gutierrez, along with 4 council members will be sworn into office this evening at Loveland City Hall just after 6:30 PM.New members of the city council include; Joan Shaffer, Cathleen McEwen and Hugh McKean. Councilman Daryle Klassen is the only incumbent to have won re-election to the council and will also be sworn-in.

A reception to honor outgoing Mayor Gene Pielin, Mayor Pro Tem Dave Clark and council members Glenn Rousey and Walt Skowron is being held at Loveland City Hall just outside the City Council Chambers located at 500 East Third St. in Loveland.Traditionally, the city clerk determines the seating arrangement for the council and rotates the location of each council member periodically with the exception of the mayor and mayor pro tem.

The mayor always sits at the center of the dais while the mayor pro tem is seated on the mayor’s right side. Immediately following the swearing-in the mayor will call for nominations for the mayor pro tem. Once the vote is complete the individual elected by their peers to serve as the mayor pro tem moves to occupy the seat next to the mayor.

However, this swearing-in ceremony might be different this year if Councilwoman Johnson has her way. Councilwoman Carol Johnson is working diligently behind the scenes to deny the new mayor and councilors an ability to elect the mayor pro tem. Convinced that newly announced council candidate Donna Rice-McCrea (see the Reporter-Herald story) will win the vacated council seat for Ward 1 thus giving the ‘old guard’ a majority, Johnson is working to delay the vote for mayor pro tem. She wants a postponement until after the special election in March when a 9th person will be elected to the council. Whether Johnson’s fellow travelers on council, Klassen, Heckel and newly elected McKean, agree to trump the normal process for purely political reasons remains to be seen.

The second highest vote getter in Ward 1 earlier this month, Jan Brown, is said to have capitulated to pressure from Loveland’s Chamber of Commerce not to seek the office again in deference to Chamber backed candidate Rice-McCrea.

Mike Case is another potential candidate in Ward 1 who would likely not allow Councilwoman Carol Johnson to dictate his choice for mayor pro tem but has yet to confirm whether or not he will seek the office. The meeting promises to be interesting and may in fact end with a tie vote for the mayor pro tem position should at least three councilors follow Johnson’s lead in putting Johnson’s agenda ahead of the city’s reputation for stability and normal protocol.

Thursday, November 12th, 2009

Torsten Eckstein will announce his candidacy for State Senate District 15 this Sunday at Conrad Ball Middle School in Loveland. Here is the LovelandPolitics story.

He will be joining the Democratic primary to compete against Loveland attorney Richard Ball. This will make for an interesting primary as Richard Ball is said to have been recruited to run for the seat by Republicrats Don Marostica and Bill Kaufman (both former state legislators). Ball comes from an established and wealthy pioneering Loveland family while Eckstein is a self-made immigrant to America from East Germany who works at CSU.

Which candidate can now persuade the base he can best represent their values and ideals remains to be seen.

Any comments?

Ward 1 Special Election – Could Determine Direction of City

Sunday, November 8th, 2009

We couldn’t help but cover the political ramifications of the special election to fill the vacancy of the Loveland Ward 1 council seat created by Councilman Gutierrez’s ascension to Loveland Mayor. read the story.

Even though the unexpired Ward 1 term has only two-years left on it, the person who fills that position will likely find themselves a tie breaker in a council evenly divided on many issues with 4 to 4 votes. Serving in the capacity for just under two-years will also give the candidate the advantage of incumbency for the next time they are up for re-election.

Council meetings also promise to be more interesting when council members’s comments are not carefully planned in advance nor their votes negotiated in private. Loveland City Manager Don Williams will need to brush-up on the opens meeting laws by the State of Colorado which intended to prevent him from choreographing the public meeting in advance by negotiating issues and votes with council members off stage and out of public view.

Loveland Commercial and McWhinney are no doubt aware of the enormous impact the outcome of the Ward 1 special election will have on their private influences over city hall and the council. Expect to see some significant money flowing into that race and maybe more competitive candidates. Just as David Clark demonstrated in his run for mayor, candidates backed by the Chamber of Commerce may try to win the seat by ignoring the City of Loveland campaign finance laws now embedded in the city charter by not reporting all their expenditures. Be careful – a new sheriff is in town and the city might just decide to enforce the city’s campaign finance laws.

Any comments?

Walter, Steve and others – please try and limit the size of your postings so others can get quickly to next comments. We may revisit a new word limit if people continue posting extra long messages. Thanks

New Era For Politics In Loveland

Wednesday, November 4th, 2009

Loveland voters have spoken. The old ways of politics in Loveland are gone – maybe for good. McWhinney cronyism is no longer the dominant force on city council.

Councilman Cecil Gutierrez, best described as a local reform candidate, was swept into the Mayor’s seat Tuesday night on November 3, while candidates Joan Shaffer, Cathleen McEwen and Hugh McKean were all elected as new members of Loveland’s City Council.

The only incumbent in the race, Daryl Klassen, did win re-election but against an unemployed 23 year-old machinist and Jan Brown who was booted from her previous position by a popular vote already. Klassen may not yet be celebrating as the “old guard” with whom he has found comfort are no longer a majority on the city council.

The most curious event of the evening was when Janet Bailey (who withdrew earlier from the race for city council) was reported to have a higher number of votes in the first count for Ward 3 than either of her opponents who stayed in the race. The County Clerk later removed her name from the vote results allowing Hugh McKean to prevail.

A special run-off election is now being planned for Loveland’s Ward 1 to fill the Council seat being left vacant by Mayor Elect Cecil Gutierrez. LovelandPolitics will closely monitor the special election and provide information regarding the candidates as we receive it.

Any impressions of the outcome?

Election Day Predictions

Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009

In a matter of hours Loveland we will know the results of the 2009 local election.

Last minute ballots can still be dropped-off at the Larimer County offices on 6th Street in downtown.

Please read our latest summary of all the candidates and races in Loveland along with some predictions. What do you predict will be the outcome of this election?

Mayor, Wards 1-4 and the Lodging Tax.