Archive for July, 2009

House District 51

Friday, July 31st, 2009

You heard it here first, McNaught vs. Loveland Mayor Gene Pielin for House District 51 is a likely scenario for the vacated House District 51 seat. A few others are expressing interest but we have not yet confirmed they have announced they are running.

Pielin has a practical problem. He is looking for a credible Republican to nominate him at the vacancy committee meeting scheduled for Thursday August 13, 2009 at 7:00 pm in Loveland’s Pulliam Building in downtown Loveland beginning at 6:00 PM.

The appointment to fill the balance of Don Marastica’s vacated seat in the legislature will be made by the 80 member Larimer County Republican Party vacancy committee which is comprised of precinct committee members from within House District 51. That group is called the 51st Representative District Republican Central Committee.

If Pielin fails to get someone to endorse him he may abandon the pursuit in private and deny ever having an interest. A number of other names have surfaced but until the meeting anyone can be nominated including from the floor of the meeting itself.

Any comments, suggestions or thoughts?

Marostica Quits Legislature To Work For Governor Ritter

Friday, July 24th, 2009

Marostica’s recent abandonment of his seat in the Colorado State House representing House District 51 (mostly Loveland) leaves one-year on his two-year term to which he was elected. Voters shouldn’t be too surprised by this news as he also failed to serve out his elected term on the Loveland City Council when it no longer served his near-term personal interests.

During the past year Marostica has waged war against the Republican Party and its more conservative members. Comparisons between Bill Kaufman, another former Republican State Legislator turned Democrat, and Don Marostica are irresistible but misguided. Kaufman never pretended to be a conservative and also left his party (if not by registration but certainly by his actions) because of his beliefs and not for a better business opportunity. Marostica’s public image as a Republican was a lie from the first day he changed his registration but too many party activists allowed his money to cloud their judgment.

This website was largely created as a tool to inform citizens of the fraud Don Marostica perpetrated first on the unsuspecting taxpayer’s of Loveland whose lack of oversight allowed him to leverage his city position into more profitable business at the taxpayer’s expense. Anyone who followed his traffic impact fee waivers for his own projects, staunch support of eminent domain for private purposes and unquenchable thirst for new taxes while serving on city council recognized him as an opportunist and a charlatan.

As evidence, take a look at this ad that ran in the Reporter-Herald in 2005 by LovelandPolitics regarding Don Marostica’s claim to be a conservative Republican during his primary against Kevan McNaught – called “A Wolf In Sheep’s Clothing”

For a period of time the proprietor of this website was attacked for not supporting the Republican nominee for that office. Marostica’s goons attempted to expel him from a minor position in the Republican Party unsuccessfully. History will now recognize Marostica as the Benedict Arnold of Colorado Republicans and those who supported him by attacking this website as misguided. However, unlike Kaufman, Democrats are not likely to accept Marostica with open arms as they know his long history of abusing the public’s trust for personal gain.

As a local developer and former high school teacher and coach Marostica has no international or even significant regional business experience beyond Northern Colorado. He is clearly not qualified for the position he bartered from the Governor in exchange for turning against his colleagues in the legislature.

The Republican Party of Larimer County can ill afford to send another turn-coat to Denver to represent their ideals of limited government which are already under siege in both Denver and Washington, D.C.

As the Loveland Reporter-Herald correctly noted, all legislators now representing Northern Colorado from the Republican Party will be appointed and not elected to their current positions. The three names so far circulated as looking into the seat are Kevan McNaught, Bob Hewson and Troy Krenning. The selection will need to balance the need for selecting an ethical person while also seeking a candidate capable of holding onto the seat in 2010.

We are confident that both Larry Carillo, Chair of the Larimer County Republican Party and Carl Smith, Chair of the Republican’s 51st District Committee, will conduct an orderly and ethical process in assembling the precinct representatives to vote on Marostica’s replacement.

Council Approves CEF’s (Capital Expansion Fees) Waiver

Wednesday, July 22nd, 2009

The Loveland City Council voted 6-2 to approve a modified CEF reduction of 61% on police, fire, park, open space, library and general government services to accommodate a McWhinney request.

Developers in Loveland have paid CEF’s to the city for over 25 years but McWhinney’s decision to build an apartment complex was used as the catalyst to put these fees on trial as excessive or unnecessary but just long enough for McWhinney to get permits for their apartment complex and reapply the same fees again for future developments.

As a result of public input and discussion by the council the proposal was modified to increase the scope by including duplexes and increasing the time the waiver will be generally available to all developers. Mayor Pro Tem Clark pointed to the fact no other developer would be likely capable of building within the next 5 months but expanding it another year means others can realistically take advantage of the waiver.

McWhinney advocates on council tried to sell the waiver for McWhinney’s development as a “stimulus” for building in the community (a popular concept) even though the very narrow time window proposed meant only McWhinney’s currently proposed 303 unit apartment building development would likely qualify. The council directed changes that were passed certainly expanded the benefit beyond only McWhinney but also created more questions about its impact on city services.

Councilman Walt Skowron, who is now running for Mayor, asked City Manager Don Williams what impact the waiver will have on Loveland’s 10 year capital improvements plan. Williams responded it would certainly impact it but couldn’t provide details until the issue is studied.

The law requires the city to provide a “rational nexus” between the fees charged for new development and the one-time costs to the city for expanding services to accommodate the growth in population. Loveland, as required by law, maintains the monies collected for CEF’s in separate accounts dedicated exclusively for the capital costs of expanding those services for which the money was collected.

While the city staff is going to prepare a review of the fees for council later this year, McWhinney claimed they needed the fees reduced immediately as they are submitting a letter of intent on their project to HUD (Housing and Urban Development) to obtain government subsidized loan guarantees to finance their project. McWhinney also induced their now routine threat that if they had to pay the normal taxes the project could not go forward.

The Mayor at first attempted to skip any public comment after McWhinney was allowed to address the council for 30 minutes in a give and take of questions and answers. He finally acquiesced and allowed public comment after it was pointed out to him that McWhinney is not the applicant and legally should have no extra-ordinary rights than any other residents impacted to address the council.

Loveland Reporter-Herald Editor May Be Red In The Face

Tuesday, July 21st, 2009

After an aggressive attack in Friday’s Loveland Reporter-Herald against those who use the internet to either dispense or gather news, the Editor, Ken Amundson, did something very foolish.

The following day (July 18, 2009) he ran a guest column of his own defending the McWhinney tax holiday proposal while attacking its detractors. Unfortunately, he got bad information and mistakenly attacked the “opposition” to the proposal for doing what the McWhinney supporters on council were in fact doing – making the tax holiday very short in time.

Read our response

Amundson defended the concept of a stimulus to help local construction workers who are out of work by mimicking the Chad McWhinney column argument from the day before. What he didn’t know (since he only apparently relied on McWhinney as his source) was that McWhinney advocates were trying to close the door on a wider stimulus to help unemployed construction workers in Loveland.

Troy McWhinney said it best to the Berthoud Trustees according to the Berthoud Reporter on another matter “Troy McWhinney, manager of WRB Investments, added a stipulation that his company have the right to buy the land back, if Berthoud decides to sell it in the next 25 years. McWhinney told the board that he didn’t want the town to sell the property to one of his competitors.”

McWhinney is a for-profit venture and has every incentive to help erect barriers to entry against their competitors. The CEFs (Capital Expansion Fees) are only a problem for McWhinney when they have to pay but not when others do.

They are not pro-business or pro-development but instead simply pro-McWhinney. As Troy’s comments to Berthoud reveal he doesn’t want the town to develop unless it is he who is profiting.

What Amundson did was confuse their propaganda from what they are really trying to accomplish behind the scenes. He defamed the very people on Loveland’s council who share his views and larger goal of stimulating the building trades by helping get everyone back to work instead of just one developer.

Maybe next time Amundson should properly check his sources so he can live up to the high journalistic standards he so capably defended in his July 17, 2009 editorial against unreliable “citizen journalists” like us.

McWhinney Makes Another Run At I-25/US 34 Funds While Also Requesting a Tax Holiday

Monday, July 20th, 2009

McWhinney doesn’t have the money for Crossroads Blvd. improvements from their taxpayer supplied slush fund called the Centerra Metro District. This despite having assured Loveland’s City Council previously on camera that they had the funds.

Now McWhinney is asking for a bail out of sorts from the City Council to allow them to take nearly half a million dollars from the I-25/U.S. 34 interchange improvements escrow fund with the city. They haven’t begun the improvements or even awarded a contract but believe the money is “available” since their newly convenient estimate says it will take less money than previously estimated. It is clearly another run at the same money Loveland residents overwhelming said was off-limits for anything other than improving the I-25 / U.S. 34 interchange.

McWhinney is also back this Tuesday (6:30 PM Council Meeting) for a third time to extract a special McWhinney Tax Holiday from Loveland’s City Council to build government subsidized low-income multi-family housing in Centerra. Once again McWhinney says the project is untenable without the proposed 61% tax reduction (CEF’s) but how do we know this? Unlike AIG, General Motors, banks and Wall Street firms the McWhinneys have long profited from government intervention on their behalf but without the need to disclose their own rewards from government assisted process.

If Chad McWhinney doesn’t cover the cost to our community of his new 303 unit apartment complex than someone needs to pay the costs required to provide these new residents local government services. Having working class taxpayers in Loveland further subsidize Chad McWhinney seems like an odd solution in tough economic times.

How can any member of Loveland’s City Council vote to manipulate the taxes to increase McWhinney’s bottom line when they don’t know what it is. Maybe Chad McWhinney needs to really start acting like a “partner” with the city as he says he is and disclose his own income from the proposed apartment project and other subsidized projects.

Perhaps if the Loveland Reporter-Herald began investigating substantive news stories instead of attacking what they call internet “citizen journalists” on their editorial page the city’s finances would be in better shape. Two suggestions would be the recent change for Rocky Scott regarding his role with McWhinney and another might be the potential termination of the Enterpise Group as a result of McWhinney pulling out their funding.

It is preposterous for Chad McWhinney to seek any further subsidies or bail-outs from Loveland’s hard working taxpayers while not disclosing his own profit from these projects. If the City of Loveland is truly his business partner shouldn’t they be privy to his profits and not only his costs? You need to know both to understand where the bottom line really is.

The lack of integrity and shame by the McWhinney organization is appalling as they ring our city council once again like an old rag for even more money while never disclosing how much is going into their own pockets.

David Clark and Alexi Grewal Running For Mayor

Friday, July 17th, 2009

Alexi Grewal was first to announce his candidacy for Loveland’s Mayor but others are likely to follow. As a near unknown in Loveland’s political circles Grewal will now be facing Mayor Pro Tem David Clark. Clark jumped-in Friday when Pielin announced he will not seek a second term as mayor.

Now that Clark and Grewal are the only two running for mayor (The Loveland Reporter-Herald listed Snyder as a mayoral candidate this morning but this was in error as he announced he is running for council) who do you think will win?

What are your thoughts?