| LovelandPolitics.com |
| Councilwoman Lashes Out Against City Volunteers Commission Chairman works for unity among commission members in wake of Johnson's letter |
----- Original Message ----- From: Carol Johnson To: Marc Cittone ; 'Jim Cox' ; Tangier Barnes - lrpintern ; Don Cook ; George Hill ; Gerald Portugal ; Gregg Ault ; Paula Sutton ; Robin Ericson ; Trudi Manuel Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 8:51 AM Subject: Re: Historic Preservation Commission Sept 21 Meeting Marc, Tangier, and Commissioners: I was not able to make the Saturday Boards and Commissions dinner as I was in Boulder in a 4 day seminar. Also I will not be able to attend the Monday, Sept 21 meeting as I will be attending the mayoral debate. Since I will not be attending, I wanted to express to all of you what I have shared with some of you individually while it is fresh in my mind. As your liaison for almost two years and someone who has attended many commission meetings in two cities, I can tell you that there seems to be some confusion in your minds as to the role of the HPC. This is your citizen advisory commitee: The Boards and Commissions Handbook describes you as an advisory body to the City Council and specifically (6) develop and assist in public education programs... including walking tours, etc. and (8) actively pursue financial assistance for preservation-related programs, to name two. These are your opportunities to make a difference in the city, not city staff's or mine, as council liaison. Since I came on board I have heard a lot of griping and moaning about how the city does not give historic preservation money or how the Commission does not have a mechanism to fix raising money. Instead of advocating or making change when you have the opportunity, you are not. Some specific examples: you have agendas and work plans, but from the chaos at meetings, I do not see good communication of expectations and roles with staff. HPC is in charge of HPC meeting agendas and workplans, not staff, so sit down with staff in your leadership role after reaching consensus among you and get that done. In your meetings, you re-hash the same misunderstandings pointing blame instead of fixing the problems. Fix the fundraising problem. Get in writing what you can and cannot do, and find a solution if you really want to fundraise. Third example: knowing it is your job to advocate for funding for Milner-Schwartz house, and sitting on your butts! Do you have any idea what a big deal it was that HPC is receiving money for this? Believe me it is, and you lost a lot of credibility with me and with council as a whole expecting that I as a council member would correct the errors Marc made in his presentation on insurance and historic markers. And were you expecting that I ask for the money? Think again. As your liaison be thrilled that I got it on the agenda for you on my own initiative. HPC is the advisory board, the citizen advocates, so where were all of you? After the November elections, council liaisons will be re-assigned. I am not sure I will stay with HPC unless there are some indication of leadership among you to actually advocate for what you want instead of whining and some leadership in getting straight who is in charge of the meetings and your goals and agendas. I am sorry if this sounds harsh, I am happy to discuss it at the October meeting. But all you need to hear why I am considering leaving this commision as liaison. It is obvious you are all passionate about historic preservation, but leaving the heavy lifting to staff or myself is just not appropriate. Carol Johnson |

| Loveland Councilwoman Carol Johnson |
| Below is a copy of the email Johnson sent the commission |